Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2403 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Celeron G540 - 146 vs 144 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 64% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $14.07 vs $39.15
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77182 minutes ago
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |