Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2403 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G540 - 322 vs 316 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 72% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $14.07 vs $49.74
- Up to 71% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - $0.05 vs $0.17 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
316
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€15.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €15.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 175 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |