Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G3930T - 171 vs 170 FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 43% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $28.52 vs $49.74
- Up to 41% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G4900 - $0.19 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 107 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
170
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |