Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 833 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $39.15 vs $950.54
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 16% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G4900 - 244 vs 210 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76533 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
244
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€1055.1
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,055.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76534 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
36.754176610978526%
Multi-Core
1051
8.508054723548936%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |