Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 182 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $39.15 vs $548.4
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 54 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 351 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for €608.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
49.87854251012146%
Multi-Core
1051
14.189280410422572%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 48 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |