Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1737 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $49.74 vs $291.75
- Up to 63% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - $0.21 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 54 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 120% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 565 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
45%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19102 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
565
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
36%
Price, €
€323.84
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for €323.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |