Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900X - $49.74 vs $288.82
- Up to 80% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 9 3900X - $0.17 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 14% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G4900 - 367 vs 322 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
322
87%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18114 minutes ago
Buy for €320.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |