Buy on Amazon
€55.21
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 16 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 68% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - $49.74 vs $153.55
- Up to 65% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 7 2700X - $0.24 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 10% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G4900 - 251 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
229
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18234 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
251
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
35%
Price, €
€170.44
32%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler - YD270XBGAFBOX
Buy for €170.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18235 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.