Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 752 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $49.74 vs $109.68
- Up to 51% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.29 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 8% better in HITMAN 3 than Celeron G4900 - 205 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
190
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
49%
Price, €
€121.75
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |