Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 460 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 16% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3200G - $49.74 vs $59.5
- Up to 4% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - $1.2 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 54 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 15% better in Starfield than Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 46 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15277 minutes ago
Buy for €66.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15278 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |