Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 752 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $49.74 vs $69.46
- Up to 27% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Ryzen 3 3100 - $0.22 vs $0.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 3% better in Monster Hunter: World than Celeron G4900 - 258 vs 251 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
251
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Buy for €77.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |