Buy on Amazon
€43.46
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1988 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 2% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-8300 - 124 vs 121 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than FX-8300 - $39.15 vs $77.55
- Up to 51% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than FX-8300 - $0.35 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€43.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G4900 3.1 GHz Used Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
121
97.58064516129032%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
49.29577464788733%
Price, €
€86.08
50%
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for €86.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.