Buy on Amazon
€55.21
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2045 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 66% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $16.76 vs $49.74
- Up to 68% better value when playing Control than Celeron G4900 - $0.09 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel® Celeron® G4900 Desktop Processor 2 Core 3.1GHz LGA1151 300 Series 54W BX80684G4900
Buy for €55.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17026 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17026 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.