Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 197 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $28.52 vs $169.73
- Up to 82% better value when playing Lost Ark than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - $0.14 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Lost Ark than Celeron G3930T - 245 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
226
92.24489795918367%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 222 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
18.181818181818183%
Price, €
€188.4
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €188.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 224 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
50.36764705882353%
Multi-Core
948
24.32016418676244%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |