Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $28.52 vs $263.92
- Up to 88% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-12900F - $0.15 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 14% better in Death Stranding than Celeron G3930T - 243 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
214
88.06584362139918%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2461 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
243
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.21/FPS
12.396694214876034%
Price, €
€292.95
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2466 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
21.583300512012606%
Multi-Core
948
6.825053995680346%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |