Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 1877 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $28.52 vs $255.92
- Up to 89% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-3960X - $0.29 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G3930T - 111 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
110
99.09909909909909%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2458 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
11.328124999999998%
Price, €
€284.07
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €284.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
79.42028985507247%
Multi-Core
948
28.23108993448481%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |