Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $28.52 vs $253.6
- Up to 87% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-14700F - $0.14 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3930T - 261 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 28 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
230
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4144 minutes ago
Buy for €281.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |