Buy on Amazon
€16.22
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $14.61 vs $190.75
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Stray than Celeron G3930T - 188 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930T 2.7 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread 35W CPU Processor LGA 1151
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Intel® Core™ i7-11700F Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 4.9 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for €211.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i7-11700F
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
26.082817705854357%
Multi-Core
948
10.784982935153584%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.