Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 735 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $28.52 vs $62.15
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 29% better in Starfield than Celeron G3930T - 58 vs 45 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75734 minutes ago
Buy for €68.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
39.7677793904209%
Multi-Core
948
19.611088125775755%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |