Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $14.61 vs $172.27
- Up to 90% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-14600K - $0.08 vs $0.78 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 18% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Celeron G3930T - 245 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
207
84.48979591836735%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
245
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
10.256410256410255%
Price, €
€191.22
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €191.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
19.529579472558805%
Multi-Core
948
5.892957046062038%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |