Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $28.52 vs $146.23
- Up to 76% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i5-14400F - $0.1 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 20% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 385 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
320
83%
Value, €/FPS
€0.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
385
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
23%
Price, €
€162.31
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €162.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |