Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $14.61 vs $71.06
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930T - 107 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Buy for €78.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
38.108484005563284%
Multi-Core
948
16.484089723526342%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |