Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - $28.52 vs $90.66
- Up to 51% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-10400 - $0.42 vs $0.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 54% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G3930T - 117 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
76
64%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 197 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.86/FPS
48%
Price, €
€100.63
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €100.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |