Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 490 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-6300 - $14.61 vs $49.75
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-6300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G3930T - 104 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Buy for €55.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
43.42313787638668%
Multi-Core
948
37.33753446238677%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |