Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1304 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3250.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3250 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $28.52 vs $40.45
- Up to 30% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-3250 - $0.19 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Buy for €44.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |