Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $14.61 vs $335.61
- Up to 95% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-10300 - $0.09 vs $1.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930T - 203 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
190
93.59605911330048%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.22
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
203
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.84/FPS
4.891304347826086%
Price, €
€372.53
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
35.01597444089457%
Multi-Core
948
19.770594369134514%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |