Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $28.52 vs $340.09
- Up to 91% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.19 vs $2.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 35 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 15% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G3930T - 187 vs 163 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
163
87.16577540106952%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
9.405940594059405%
Price, €
€377.5
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €377.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
18.65214431586113%
Multi-Core
948
4.913699269164982%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |