Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 1295 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $28.52 vs $131.6
- Up to 76% better value when playing Remnant II than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - $0.4 vs $1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 13% better in Remnant II than Celeron G3930T - 89 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
79
88.76404494382022%
Value, €/FPS
€0.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4005 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
89
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.64/FPS
24.39024390243903%
Price, €
€146.08
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
35.30927835051546%
Multi-Core
948
15.357200712781468%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Renoir |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |