Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $28.52 vs $95.05
- Up to 69% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 3 2200G - $0.17 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930T - 195 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
190
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€31.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €31.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.54/FPS
31%
Price, €
€105.51
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for €105.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |