Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than FX-6300 - 210 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 66% cheaper than FX-6300 - $14.61 vs $42.44
- Up to 79% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-6300 - $0.08 vs $0.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
210
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€16.22
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €16.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
208
99.04761904761905%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
21.052631578947366%
Price, €
€47.11
34%
Buy for €47.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |