Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $46.74 vs $362.05
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 86% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3930 - 52 vs 28 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76168 minutes ago
Buy for €401.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
43.02901627742392%
Multi-Core
1043
11.046388477017581%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |