Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $64.34 vs $263.92
- Up to 68% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-12900F - $0.61 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 31% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930 - 153 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 24 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
76.47058823529412%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1613 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.91/FPS
31.93717277486911%
Price, €
€292.95
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €292.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1619 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
23.946435604568727%
Multi-Core
1043
7.508999280057595%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |