Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900KF is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-11900KF - $46.74 vs $190.11
- Up to 66% better value when playing New World than Core i9-11900KF - $0.52 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900KF
- Performs up to 39% better in New World than Celeron G3930 - 139 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
100
71.94244604316546%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52152 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.52/FPS
34.21052631578947%
Price, €
€211.02
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €211.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
26.24082865774709%
Multi-Core
1043
10.301234567901234%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |