Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $64.34 vs $231.95
- Up to 69% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-14700F - $0.47 vs $1.54 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 11% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G3930 - 167 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 28 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
151
90.41916167664671%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
167
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
30.519480519480517%
Price, €
€257.46
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for €257.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
21.90990990990991%
Multi-Core
1043
6.017770597738288%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |