Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14600K is 2478 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - $64.34 vs $172.27
- Up to 11% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-14600K - $0.9 vs $1.01 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 139% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G3930 - 189 vs 79 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 20 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
79
41.7989417989418%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 250 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
189
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
89.10891089108911%
Price, €
€191.22
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €191.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
21.66785459729152%
Multi-Core
1043
6.483495990551377%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |