Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $71.68 vs $131.6
- Up to 40% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-11600K - $0.55 vs $0.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than Celeron G3930 - 158 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
145
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.55/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7095 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
59%
Price, €
€146.08
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €146.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |