Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - $71.68 vs $102.37
- Up to 18% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-11600 - $0.71 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 16% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 130 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.71/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18297 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
81%
Price, €
€113.63
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €113.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18298 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |