Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 1% better in Rocket League than Core i3-3240T - 679 vs 673 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 60% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $18.79 vs $46.74
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76583 minutes ago
Buy for €20.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76582 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
447
73.51973684210526%
Multi-Core
971
93.09683604985618%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |