Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - $64.34 vs $335.61
- Up to 80% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i3-10300 - $0.61 vs $3.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10300 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 6% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G3930 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
117
94.35483870967742%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3/FPS
20.333333333333332%
Price, €
€372.53
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €372.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
38.849840255591054%
Multi-Core
1043
21.751824817518248%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |