Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $46.74 vs $68.41
- Up to 21% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-10100 - $0.22 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 11% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G3930 - 267 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
240
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Buy for €75.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |