Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 455 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 1% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G3930 - 173 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $39.15 vs $46.74
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for €51.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74705 minutes ago
Buy for €43.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
98.7012987012987%
Multi-Core
1043
99.23882017126546%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |