Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 1288 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $64.34 vs $723.87
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 51 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G3930 - 136 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 32 vs 2 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€803.5
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €803.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
36.27684964200477%
Multi-Core
1043
8.443293127175584%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |