Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 1933 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 12% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 213 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
29.076996652319465%
Multi-Core
1043
9.519897772909822%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |