Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $64.34 vs $122.92
- Up to 43% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $0.56 vs $0.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3930 - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
92.7536231884058%
Value, €/FPS
€0.56/FPS
100%
Price, €
€71.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3821 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
56.565656565656575%
Price, €
€136.44
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for €136.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
35.68075117370892%
Multi-Core
1043
14.44198283024093%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |