Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G3930 vs Ryzen 5 3600XT

Celeron G3930 vs Ryzen 5 3600XT: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Celeron G3930

2.9 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Intel Celeron G3930 2.9 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread CPU Processor 2M 51W LGA 1151

Buy for 71.42 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3821 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

3.8 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT R5 3600XT 3.8 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 7NM 95W L3=32M 100-000000281 Socket AM4

Buy for 136.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3824 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G3930

2.9 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Intel Celeron G3930 2.9 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread CPU Processor 2M 51W LGA 1151

Buy for 71.42 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3821 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

3.8 GHz | 6-core

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT R5 3600XT 3.8 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 7NM 95W L3=32M 100-000000281 Socket AM4

Buy for 136.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3824 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Ryzen 5 3600XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600XT is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930

  • Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $64.34 vs $122.92
  • Up to 43% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Ryzen 5 3600XT - $0.56 vs $0.99 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT - 51 vs 95 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

  • Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3930 - 138 vs 128 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of The Last of Us Part I.
The Last of Us Part I

The Last of Us Part I

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


FPS

128

92.7536231884058%

Value, €/FPS

€0.56/FPS

100%

Price, €

€71.42

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron G3930 2.9 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread CPU Processor 2M 51W LGA 1151

Buy for 71.42 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3821 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


FPS

138

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.99/FPS

56.565656565656575%

Price, €

€136.44

52%

FPS Winner

CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT R5 3600XT 3.8 GHz Six-Core Twelve-Thread CPU Processor 7NM 95W L3=32M 100-000000281 Socket AM4

Buy for 136.44 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 3824 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G3930 Logo
Celeron G3930

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


Single-Core

608

35.68075117370892%

Multi-Core

1043

14.44198283024093%

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT Logo
Ryzen 5 3600XT

Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019


Single-Core

1704

100%

Multi-Core

7222

100%

Intel Celeron G3930

vs

AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT

Jan 3rd, 2017Release Date
Jul 7th, 2019
CeleronCollectionRyzen 5
Kaby LakeCodenameMatisse
Intel Socket 1151SocketAMD Socket AM4
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
6
2Threads
12
2.9 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.8 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.5 GHz
51 W
TDP95 W
14 nmProcess Size
7 nm
29.0xMultiplier
38.0x
Intel HD 610
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.