Buy on Amazon
€71.42
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $219
Availability
MSRP in USD: $219
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 98 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930 - 399 vs 377 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G3930 2.9 GHz Dual-Core Dual-Thread CPU Processor 2M 51W LGA 1151
Buy for €71.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Ryzen 5 1600
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
56.92883895131086%
Multi-Core
1043
22.782874617737004%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.