Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G630 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G630 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1458 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G630.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Pentium G630 - 256 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Pentium G630 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $27.41 vs $29.18
- Up to 8% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G3900 - $0.12 vs $0.13 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13351 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
250
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€30.42
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €30.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |