Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3420 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3420 is 730 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3420 - 51 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3420
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3900 - 158 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $15.43 vs $29.18
- Up to 48% better value when playing F1 23 than Celeron G3900 - $0.11 vs $0.21 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9623 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€17.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €17.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3420 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |