Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9960X is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-9960X - $29.18 vs $511.83
- Up to 94% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i9-9960X - $0.29 vs $4.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9960X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9960X
- Performs up to 15% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G3900 - 127 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
110
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for €568.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9960X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |