Buy on Amazon
€32.39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 1144 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $29.18 vs $406.54
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Minecraft than Celeron G3900 - 713 vs 614 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-9900X X-Series Processor 10 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC5)
Buy for €451.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
39.045698924731184%
Multi-Core
992
10.424548129466164%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 2 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.