Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 2690 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - $29.18 vs $350.96
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 51 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 23% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 235 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
Buy for €389.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 99 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
18.711755233494365%
Multi-Core
992
4.543580818027756%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |