Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10980XE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10980XE is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i9-10980XE - $29.18 vs $595.92
- Up to 95% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-10980XE - $0.06 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than Intel Core i9-10980XE - 51 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10980XE doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10980XE
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G3900 - 539 vs 508 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 36 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
508
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€32.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €32.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10970 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
539
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
4%
Price, €
€661.47
4%
FPS Winner
Buy for €661.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10974 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10980XE |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Skylake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 18 |
2 | Threads | 36 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |